The $4 billion Lobito Corridor rail project, once a flagship initiative of the Biden administration’s engagement with Africa, is now under scrutiny as the Trump administration recalibrates U.S. policy on the continent. Originally envisioned as a counterbalance to China’s growing influence, the project spans 800 miles, connecting Angola’s mineral-rich interior to the Atlantic Ocean. It serves as a vital trade route for key resources such as cobalt and copper—minerals critical to the global clean-energy transition.
Under the Biden administration, the U.S. positioned the Lobito Corridor as a strategic investment not only in infrastructure but also in regional economic development, aiming to foster local industries, improve agricultural productivity, and promote commercial partnerships. However, President Trump’s approach to Africa—marked by an emphasis on economic self-interest and a reduction in traditional aid—has raised questions about whether the project will continue to receive full U.S. backing.
Despite initial uncertainty, recent diplomatic engagements indicate that the Trump administration may support the rail project, albeit with a more transactional focus. The acting U.S. ambassador to Angola, James Story, led a delegation of Western envoys on a three-day tour of the corridor, signaling continued American interest. However, the emphasis appears to be shifting from holistic economic development to securing U.S. access to Africa’s rich mineral resources.
Angola, a key player in Africa’s economic landscape, remains optimistic about strengthening ties with the U.S. and attracting investment beyond mere resource extraction. The country’s leadership hopes that any continued U.S. involvement will extend to sectors such as manufacturing, energy, and telecommunications—ensuring that Africa moves beyond being a raw material supplier to becoming a hub for industrial growth.
The future of the Lobito Corridor under Trump’s presidency will be a crucial test of America’s commitment to Africa. Will the U.S. maintain a balanced approach that fosters economic growth in Angola and beyond, or will its Africa strategy be narrowly focused on resource competition with China? The coming months will provide clarity on whether the Trump administration’s Africa policy aligns with long-term regional development—or merely short-term economic gains for the U.S.
